The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill, 2010
PRS LEGISLATIVE WEBSITE
- The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill, 2010 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 1, 2010. The Bill was introduced by the Shri M. Veerappa Moily, the Minister of Law and Justice.
- The Bill seeks to (a) lay down judicial standards, (b) provide for the accountability of judges, and (c) establish mechanisms for investigating individual complaints for misbehaviour or incapacity of a judge of the Supreme Court or High Courts. It also provides a mechanism for the removal of judges.
- The procedure of removal of judges is presently regulated by the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. The Bill seeks to repeal the Act.
- The Bill requires judges to practise universally accepted values of judicial life. These include a prohibition on: (a) close association with individual members of the Bar who practise in the same court as the judge, (b) allowing family members who are members of the Bar to use the judge’s residence for professional work, (c) hearing or deciding matters in which a member of the judge’s family or relative or friend is concerned, (d) entering into public debate on political matters or matters which the judge is likely to decide, and (e) engaging in trade or business and speculation in securities.
- Judges will also be required to declare their assets and liabilities, and also that of their spouse and children. Such declaration has to take place within 30 days of the judge taking his oath to enter his office. Every judge will also have to file an annual report of his assets and liabilities. The assets and liabilities of the judge will be displayed on the website of the court to which he belongs.
- The Bill establishes two authorities to investigate complaints against judges. The Two authorities are:
- National Judicial Oversight Committee; and
- Scrutiny Panel.
- Initial complaints will be made to the Oversight Committee, and they will be referred to the Scrutiny Panel.
- A Scrutiny Panel will be constituted in the Supreme Court and every High Court. It shall consist of a former Chief Justice and two sitting judges of that court. If the Scrutiny Panel feels there are sufficient grounds for proceeding against the judge, it shall report on its findings to the Oversight Committee. If it finds that the complaint is frivolous, or that there not sufficient grounds for inquiring against into the complaint, it shall submit a report to the Oversight Committee giving its findings for not proceeding with the complaint.
- Frivolous or vexatious complaints may be penalised by the Oversight Committee.
- The Oversight Committee will consist a retired Chief Justice of India as the Chairperson, a judge of the Supreme Court nominated by the sitting Chief Justice of India, a Chief Justice of the High Court, the Attorney General for India, and an eminent person appointed by the President.
- If the Scrutiny Panel recommends investigation into a complaint against a judge, the Oversight Committee will constitute an investigation committee to investigate into the complaint. The inquiry committee will consist of not more than three members. It will have some powers of a civil court and also the power to seize documents and keep them in its custody.
- The investigation committee will frame definite charges against the judge and shall communicate the same to the judge. The judge shall be given an opportunity to present his case, but if he/ she chooses not be heard, the proceedings may be heard without him present.
- If the charges against a judge are proved, the Oversight Committee may recommend that judicial work shall not be assigned to the judge. It may also issue advisories and warnings if it feels that the charges proved do not warrant the removal of the judge. If the Committee feels that the charges proved merit the removal of the judge, it shall (a) request the judge to resign voluntarily, and if he fails to do so, (b) advise the president to proceed with the removal of the judge. In such a case, the President shall refer the matter to Parliament.
- A motion for removal of a judge can also be introduced in Parliament by members of Parliament. In such a case, the Speaker or the Chairman can either admit the notice, or refuse to admit it. If the notice is admitted, the matter shall be referred to the Oversight Committee for inquiry.
- The Bill exempts documents and records of proceedings related to a complaint from the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The reports of the investigation committee and the order of the Oversight Committee shall be made public.
FOR THE BILL CLICK THE LINK:
- Judicial Accountability Bill introduced in Lok Sabha (indialawyers.wordpress.com)
- Cabinet nod for judicial accountability bill (thehindu.com)
- Bill on judicial accountability approved (thehindu.com)
- Ensuring judicial accountability (indialawyers.wordpress.com)
- Sweeping bill to rein in errant judges – Centre proposes complaints panels, addresses ‘uncle judge’ problem (indialawyers.wordpress.com)
- Cabinet nod for judicial accountability bill (indialawyers.wordpress.com)
- Corruption in judiciary: Time for action (indialawyers.wordpress.com)
- Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill 2010 wins Cabinet Approval (yogeshnaiks-blawg.blogspot.com)
- Judges’ accountability bill: Complainant needs to give solid evidence (topinews.com)
- Cabinet approves judicial accountability bill (ibnlive.in.com)