LAW RESOURCE INDIA

VALUES IN JUDICIAL LIFE TO GET LAW STATUS SOON

Posted in CONSTITUTION, JUDICIAL REFORMS, JUDICIARY, JUSTICE by NNLRJ INDIA on February 1, 2010

MAIL TODAY FEBRUARY 1, 2010

THE RESOLUTION by judges on the restatement of values in judicial life could soon get a statutory status. The government has decided to incorporate several do’s and don’ts in the proposed law on judicial standards and accountability for judges.Union law minister M. Veerappa Moily said on Sunday the guidelines on the conduct of judges in the resolution would find place in the Judges ( Standards and Accountability) Bill. It is likely to be introduced in Parliament in the coming session, he said. Moily said the proposed law would usher in a new horizon for the judiciary by ensuring that a tainted judge is not able to continue in his or her position. The law will, for the first time, provide for action other than impeachment of an errant judge. The resolution adopted by the judges in 1997, among other things, barred them from deciding cases of relatives and friends, speculating in shares and receiving gifts.

The decision assumes significance since the Supreme Court had been contending that such resolutions were not binding on judges. The Delhi High Court, in the assets case had, however, rejected the argument made on behalf of the Supreme Court by attorney general G. E. Vahanvati.

It had held that the resolution on declaration of assets by judges to the chief justice was binding on all judges. The proposed law is also likely to address the issue of declaration of assets by judges. Sources said the government had dropped the idea of reintroducing the Judges ( Declaration of Assets and Liabilities) Bill, which had to be withdrawn following stiff opposition in the Rajya Sabha.

MPs had opposed the move to keep the information on assets of high court and Supreme Court judges outside the ambit of the Right to Information ( RTI) Act. On being pointed out that Vahanvati had suggested an amendment in law to keep the office of the Chief Justice of India outside the ambit of the RTI, Moily said a proposal was being considered.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

For the Readers we are attaching the Full Court Resolution

Restatement of Values of Judicial Life (1999)

On May 7, 1997, the Supreme Court of India in its Full Court adopted a Charter called the “Restatement of Values of Judicial Life” to serve as a guide to be observed by Judges, essential for independent, strong and respected judiciary, indispensable in the impartial administration of justice.  This Resolution was preceded by a draft statement circulated to all the High Courts of the country and suitably redrafted in the light of the suggestions received.  It has been described as the ‘restatement of the pre-existing and universally accepted norms, guidelines and conventions’ observed by Judges.  It is a complete code of the canons of judicial ethics.  It reads as under:

  1. Justice must not merely be done but it must also be seen to be done.  The behaviour and conduct of members of the higher judiciary must reaffirm the people’s faith in the impartiality of the judiciary.  Accordingly, any act of a Judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court, whether in official or personal capacity, which erodes the credibility of this perception has to be avoided.
  2. A Judge should not contest the election to any office of a Club, society or other association; further he shall not hold such elective office except in a society or association connected with the law.
  3. Close association with individual members of the Bar, particularly those who practice in the same court, shall be eschewed.
  4. A Judge should not permit any member of his immediate family, such as spouse, son, daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law or any other close relative, if a member of the Bar, to appear before him or even be associated in any manner with a cause to be dealt with by him.
  5. No member of his family, who is a member of the Bar, shall be permitted to use the residence in which the Judge actually resides or other facilities for professional work.
  6. A Judge should practice a degree of aloofness consistent with the dignity of his office.
  7. A Judge shall not hear and decide a matter in which a member of his family, a close relation or a friend is concerned.
  8. A Judge shall not enter into public debate or express his views in public on political matters or on matters that are pending or are likely to arise for judicial determination.
  9. A Judge is expected to let his judgments speak for themselves.  He shall not give interviews to the media.
  10. A Judge shall not accept gifts or hospitality except from his family, close relations and friends.
  11. A Judge shall not hear and decide a matter in which a company in which he holds shares is concerned unless he has disclosed his interest and no objection to his hearing and deciding the matter is raised.
  12. A Judge shall not speculate in shares, stocks or the like.
  13. A Judge should not engage directly or indirectly in trade or business, either by himself or in association with any other person.  (Publication of a legal treatise or any activity in the nature of a hobby shall not be construed as trade or business).
  14. A Judge should not ask for, accept contributions or otherwise actively associate himself with the raising of any fund for any purpose.
  15. A Judge should not seek any financial benefit in the form of a perquisite or privilege attached to his office unless it is clearly available.  Any doubt in this behalf must be got resolved and clarified through the Chief Justice.
  16. Every Judge must at all times be conscious that he is under the public gaze and there should be no act or omission by him which is unbecoming of the high office he occupies and the public esteem in which that office is held.

These are only the “Restatement of the Values of Judicial Life” and are not meant to be exhaustive but illustrative of what is expected of a Judge. The above “restatement” was ratified and adopted by Indian Judiciary in the Chief Justices’ Conference 1999.  All the High Courts in the country have also adopted the same in their respective Full Court Meetings.

For Further Readings :

CANONS OF JUDICIAL ETHICS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: