LAW RESOURCE INDIA

THE AYODHYA JUDGEMENT VERDICT / ORDERS – RAM JANAMBHOOMI – BABRI MASJID ORDER OF THE LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Posted in JUDICIARY, JUSTICE by NNLRJ INDIA on September 30, 2010

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Thursday ruled by a majority verdict that the disputed land at Ayodhya would be jointly held by Hindus, Muslims and the Nirmohi Akhara.

Holding the disputed site was the birthplace of Lord Ram, the majority on the Bench said that each party – the Hindu Mahasabha, the Sunni Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara — would be entitled to one-third share of the disputed land, with Lord Ram’s idol continuing to stay at the place where he was placed.In their separate judgements on the sensitive 60-year old title dispute on Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid structure, Justices S U Khan and Sudhir Agarwal said the area under the central dome of the three-domed structure where Lord Ram’s idol exists belongs to Hindus.Justices Khan and Agarwal decreed that the 2.7 acre land comprising the disputed site should be divided into three equal parts and be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing ‘Ram Lala Virajman’ (Ram deity).

THE JUDGEMENT ARE ENCLOSED BELOW

GIST OF HONOBLE JUSTICE AGGARWAL JUDGEMENT -LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

GIST OF HONOBLE JUSTICE S U KHAN JUDGEMENT – LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Brief Summary AYODHYA DISPUTE – LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Issues of Briefing – AYODHYA DISPUTE – LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. NAUSHAD said, on October 1, 2010 at 00:29

    IT IS NOT AT ALL VERDICT BY ANY COURT BUT AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT IN PANCHAYAT STYLE TO RESTORE PEACE AND HARMONY WHICH COULD NOT BE ARRIVED BY THE PARTIES OUT OF COURT.COURT HAS TOTALLY FAILED TO APPRECIATE EVIDENCES AND TESTIMONIES OF THE WITNESSES BUT PASSED THE JUDGEMENT AGAINST THE RULE OF LAW.

  2. manzoor said, on October 1, 2010 at 08:12

    -I fully endorse the view of Mr Naushad.Primafacie it appears that court has tried to secure amicable settlement for preventing any discord between two communities.Has to be appreciated for overall good atmosphere.

  3. vidyadhar joshi said, on October 2, 2010 at 17:37

    98%Muslims in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are converted Hindu.Ancestors of Muslim in Indian subcontinent are converted due to threat or fraud.Babar is not the ancestor of Indian Muslims. Considering this Muslim should welcome the verdit of Allahabad Highcourt.

  4. Venkatesh P. Dalwai said, on October 4, 2010 at 19:39

    What politicians failed to do for so many decades, judges have done in panchayat way. Tough judgement may or may not stand strict legal test still its really good one. Must be accepted by all.

  5. Abdul Baqui said, on November 8, 2010 at 12:41

    The verdict given on Ram janam Bhoomi VS Demolished Babri Masjid on 6 Dec 1992 by centralGovt.as well as by state government through hindu mobs shows that the justices are unfit orthdqx personals.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: