HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD – RAM JANAM BHOOMI BABRI MASJID VERDICT OF THE FULL BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
|
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUDGEMENT/ ORDERS
| Case Details | ||
| 1. | Other Original Suit No. 1 of 1989 | Gopal Singh Visharad (Now Dead) & Others Vs. Zahoor Ahmad & Others |
| 2. | Other Original Suit No. 3 of 1989 | Nirmohi Akhara & Others Vs. Baboo Priya Dutt Ram and Others |
| 3. | Other Original Suit No. 4 of 1989 | The Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P.& Others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad (Now Dead) & Others. |
| 4. | Other Original Suit No. 5 of 1989 | Bhagwan Sri Ram Virajman and Others Vs. Rajendra Singh and Others |
JUDGEMENT ORDERS
//
| *Vol 21 Per Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal J. includes : | |
| 1. | Appendix 8 : General Index |
| 2. | Appendix 9 : Citation Index |
| 3. | Appendix 10 : Reference Book Index |
Related Articles
- Ayodhya: Know the judges; questions before HC (ibnlive.in.com)
- Text of the Rulings on an Indian Holy Site (thelede.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Ayodhya verdict: HC says divide land into 3 parts (ibnlive.in.com)
- Three judges’ lives away from the Ayodhya Bench (ibnlive.in.com)
- Gist of judgment: Justice Dharam Veer Sharma (ibnlive.in.com)
- HC rules spot under the dome is Ram Janmasthan (ibnlive.in.com)
- Court Splits Ayodhya Land Between Hindus, Muslims (businessweek.com)
- Ayodhya: Judge gives dissenting order on plea (thehindu.com)
- Judge: I wasn’t consulted on deferment plea (thehindu.com)
- No out-of-court solution or delaying Ayodhya verdict: Court (topinews.com)
Advertisements
The judgement has put at rest the uncertainty prevailed over a long period. While there are points and counterpoints for and against the judgement, it gives great relief to the nation and the fact that no untoward incidents have taken place after the pronouncement of the verdict amply prove that Indians are united. The parties concerned instead of further prolonging the issue by taking it to the Supreme Court should evolve a method by which they show to the world that we are indeed a proud nation.
It was the good & Historical Judgement came in the intrest of Nation, People of India. The judgement must be honoured by non Hindus in the intrest of Country. Tis is an unending story, which will never come to end.
Structure was a temple built by hindu king on janam bhumi land, Attacker destroyed this structure & built Masjid. ASI confirms the report.
As per Mr. Geelani wanted to go to SC. Please Dont test the faith of Hindus, If it crosses the limit, then NO MASJID WILL BE ON DISPUTED SITE AS WELL AS IN PANCHKOSI PARIKARMA.
the decision is very good atleast it is the best judgement on this critical case. Thanks
This judgement itself it says it is not finalised,Then we can wait for supreme court judgement through appeal from the any one the parties.
finaly is it not mr tripathi who is hero of indian harmony? what of so called thekedar of indian socity
This judgement itself it says it is not finalised ?? we r accepting the Hon’l Suprem Court will come to an conclosition within the short period of time ,, And the Hinhu Saint should start their “puja-Archana” .
salamalekum this is very good judgement for all indian citizen sukria hc thank
this judgment is the best judgment in history of low because it bond us in one chain. this judgment not only for hindu or muslim this for indian. thank u judges for make us indian.
This is a rational and very objective judgement based on archeological evidences but its part that 1/3 of desputed land should be given to Muslims has not been justified even in the verdict itself. Instead of Supreme Muslims should go to some other place to build a mosque if they want and need.
The Court, Law and Judges are supposed to make judgement based on the facts, and evidences and not supposedly under pressure and threats.
Why do we need court to do reconciliation which can be done between themselves. Muslim believe in Allah’s presence everywhere and they need to understand that few acres of land is meaningless fight. If it can make happy Hindu followers, it shouldn’t be a problem but the way they took from muslims by conducting riots and killings are unacceptable. I can read that in their comments above. Baba Mukund and Ramesh, don’t threaten because God is watching all of us and we are answerable.
There is no evidence that Ram was a real human and we all know that he was purely articulated. I would rather suggest my hindu friends to read Vedas (real hindu scriptures) rather than stories like Ramayana or Mahabaratha.
Anyway, we will take another 10 years to get the Supreme court order and by that time, I hope another riot doesn’t take place.
The Indians are united after this judgement because it went in favour of Saviours (Hindus) and not in favour of Muslims (Terrorists). I am a bit surprised who is the real saviour and terrorist.
I don’t know when we guys will have guts to accept and speak the truth. Until then, India will be among the top corrupted countries of the world. It is shameful but it doesn’t affect us being an Indian.