LAW RESOURCE INDIA

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD – RAM JANAM BHOOMI BABRI MASJID VERDICT OF THE FULL BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Posted in JUDICIARY, JUSTICE by NNLRJ INDIA on October 1, 2010
Coram :-

Hon’ble Sibghat Ullah Khan ,J.

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Hon’ble Dharam Veer Sharma, J.

Gist of Judgements :-
Hon’ble Sibghat Ullah Khan ,J.

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Hon’ble Dharam Veer Sharma, J.
Brief summary
Issues for briefing

JUDGEMENT/ ORDERS

Case Details
1. Other Original Suit No. 1 of 1989 Gopal Singh Visharad (Now Dead) & Others
Vs.
Zahoor Ahmad & Others
2. Other Original Suit No. 3 of 1989 Nirmohi Akhara & Others
Vs.
Baboo Priya Dutt Ram and Others
3. Other Original Suit No. 4 of 1989 The Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P.& Others
Vs.
Gopal Singh Visharad (Now Dead) & Others.
4. Other Original Suit No. 5 of 1989 Bhagwan Sri Ram Virajman and Others
Vs.
Rajendra Singh and Others

JUDGEMENT ORDERS

Judgments Per
Hon’ble Sibghat Ullah Khan ,J. Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer Sharma, J.
Consolidated Judgment in
OOS No. 1 of 1989,
OOS No. 3 of 1989,
OOS No. 4 of 1989 &
OOS No. 5 of 1989
Consolidated Judgment in
OOS No. 1 of 1989,
OOS No. 3 of 1989,
OOS No. 4 of 1989 &
OOS No. 5 of 1989
Vol 1 Judgment in OOS No. 1 of 1989
– do – Vol 2 Judgment in OOS No. 3 of 1989
– do – Vol 3 Judgment in
OOS No. 4 of 1989
Vol 1
– do – Vol 4 Judgment in
OOS No. 4 of 1989
Vol 2
– do – Vol 5 Judgment in
OOS No. 4 of 1989
Vol 3
– do – Vol 6 Judgment in
OOS No. 4 of 1989
Vol 4
– do – : Vol 7 Judgment in OOS No. 5 of 1989
– do – Vol 8 Index of Annexure – I to III
– do – : Vol 9 Annexure – I
– do – Vol 10 Annexure – II
– do – Vol 11 Annexure – III
– do – Vol 12 Page wise Index of Annexure IV
– do – Vol 13 Annexure IV – Page 1 to 125
– do – Vol 14 Annexure IV – Page 126 to 128
– do – Vol 15 Annexure IV – Page 129 to 162
– do – Vol 16 Page wise Index of Annexure V
– do – Vol 17 Annexure V – Page 1 to 14
– do – Vol 18 Annexure V – Page 15 to 59
– do – Vol 19 Annexure V – Page 60 to 117
– do – Vol 20 Annexure V – Page 112A
– do – Vol 21* Annexure V – Page 118 to 189
Annexure V – Page 190 to 220
Annexure V – Page 221 to 281

//

*Vol 21 Per Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal J. includes :
1. Appendix 8 : General Index
2. Appendix 9 : Citation Index
3. Appendix 10 : Reference Book Index
Advertisements

THE AYODHYA JUDGEMENT VERDICT / ORDERS – RAM JANAMBHOOMI – BABRI MASJID ORDER OF THE LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Posted in JUDICIARY, JUSTICE by NNLRJ INDIA on September 30, 2010

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Thursday ruled by a majority verdict that the disputed land at Ayodhya would be jointly held by Hindus, Muslims and the Nirmohi Akhara.

Holding the disputed site was the birthplace of Lord Ram, the majority on the Bench said that each party – the Hindu Mahasabha, the Sunni Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara — would be entitled to one-third share of the disputed land, with Lord Ram’s idol continuing to stay at the place where he was placed.In their separate judgements on the sensitive 60-year old title dispute on Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid structure, Justices S U Khan and Sudhir Agarwal said the area under the central dome of the three-domed structure where Lord Ram’s idol exists belongs to Hindus.Justices Khan and Agarwal decreed that the 2.7 acre land comprising the disputed site should be divided into three equal parts and be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing ‘Ram Lala Virajman’ (Ram deity).

THE JUDGEMENT ARE ENCLOSED BELOW

GIST OF HONOBLE JUSTICE AGGARWAL JUDGEMENT -LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

GIST OF HONOBLE JUSTICE S U KHAN JUDGEMENT – LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Brief Summary AYODHYA DISPUTE – LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Issues of Briefing – AYODHYA DISPUTE – LUCKNOW BENCH OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

%d bloggers like this: