LAW RESOURCE INDIA

Judges under scanner

Posted in ACCESS TO JUSTICE, ACCOUNTABILITY, CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, JUDICIAL REFORMS, JUDICIARY, JUSTICE by NNLRJ INDIA on December 3, 2010
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

FROM THE TRIBUNE

1.   Justice Nirmal Yadav (Uttarakhand High Court): The CBI court in Chandigarh has adjourned the hearing to December 14 as Special Judge Darshan Singh is on leave. During the previous hearing of the Cash-at-judge’s door case, it was adjourned following the CBI’s submission that the prosecution sanction against Justice Yadav was awaited. The CBI had earlier sought permission from the Union Law Ministry and the President’s Secretariat for initiating prosecution against her.

2.   Justice Soumitra Sen (Kolkata High Court): He has been held guilty by the inquiry committee of “misconduct” tantamount to “misbehaviour” warranting his removal as a judge by impeachment. The Rajya Sabha Secretary-General has asked him to file a reply to the inquiry report by December 9.

3.   Chief Justice P.D. Dinakaran (Sikkim High Court): The Rajya Sabha Chairman has reconstituted the three-member inquiry committee with Justice Aftab Alam of the Supreme Court as its head. He replaces Justice V.S. Sirpurkar who had recused himself from hearing the case against the backdrop of questions raised on his neutrality.

4.   Ghaziabad PF scam: As many as 26 judges are involved. Ashutosh Asthana, the key accused, died mysteriously in prison. The Supreme Court has refused to shift the case to Delhi.

5.   Former CJIs: After former Union Law Minister Shanti Bhushan alleged that eight of 16 former Chief Justices of India were corrupt, his advocate son, Prashant Bhushan, filed another affidavit in the Supreme Court listing alleged instances of corruption against six of them – Justice Ranganath Misra, Justice K.N. Singh, Justice A.M. Ahmadi, Justice M.M. Punchi, Justice A.S. Anand and Justice Y.K. Sabharwal. Mr Prashant Bhushan is now facing a contempt case in the apex court.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101203/edit.htm#6

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. manzoor said, on December 3, 2010 at 19:12

    Judges consider themselves to be kings not caring about dispensation of justice in the manner it is required to be dispensed,they very often use the power vested in them under constitution in brute manner,their impartiality also is visibly doubtful they are often scared not to loose chance of getting adjusted at alternative forums by state,they need to be introspect them selves.They need serve as judges outside their parent state to avoid being part of uncle judge syndrome which is rampant in large number of high court.;judges also need avoiding attending lavish parties thrown by practicing advocates and business magnates,such an act negates the very sacred nature of justice dispensation system


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: